Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 624
Filter
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 109(1): 182-190, 2023 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243341

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation systems, commonly used to disinfect surfaces, drinking water, and air, stem from historical practice to use sunlight to disinfect household items after contagious illness. Currently, it is still recommended in viral outbreak contexts such as COVID-19, Ebola, and Marburg to expose soft surfaces to sunlight after washing with detergent or disinfecting with chlorine. However, sunlight that reaches the Earth's surface is in the UVA/UVB wavelengths, whereas UV disinfection systems typically rely on biocidal UVC. Our goal was to fill the evidence gap on the efficacy of sunlight disinfection on surface materials common in low-resource healthcare settings by seeding four surfaces (stainless steel, nitrile, tarp, cloth) with three microorganisms (viral surrogate bacteriophages Phi6 and MS2 and Escherichia coli bacteria), with and without soil load, and exposing to three sunlight conditions (full sun, partial sun, cloudy). We conducted 144 tests in triplicate and found: solar radiation averaged 737 W/m2 (SD = 333), 519 W/m2 (SD = 65), and 149 W/m2 (SD = 24) for full sun, partial sun, and cloudy conditions; significantly more surfaces averaged ≥ 4 log10 reduction value (LRV) for Phi6 than MS2 and E. coli (P < 0.001) after full sun exposure, and no samples achieved ≥ 4 LRV for partial sun or cloudy conditions. On the basis of our results, we recommend no change to current protocols of disinfecting materials first with a 0.5% chlorine solution then moving to sunlight to dry. Additional field-based research is recommended to understand sunlight disinfection efficacy against pathogenic organisms on healthcare relevant surfaces during actual outbreak contexts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Water Purification , Humans , Sunlight , Disinfection/methods , Escherichia coli , Chlorine , Ultraviolet Rays , Water Purification/methods
3.
New Microbiol ; 46(2): 161-169, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235653

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet-C (UVC) has been used to cause virus inactivation. The virucidal activity of three UV light lamps [UVC high frequencies (HF), UVC+B LED and UVC+A LED] was evaluated against the enveloped feline coronavirus (FCoVII), a surrogate model of SARS-CoV-2, the enveloped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), and the naked encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV). Virucidal assays were performed at different time points of UV-light exposure (i.e., 5, 30 minutes and 1, 6, and 8 hours), placing each virus 180 cm below the perpendicular irradiation of the lamp and 1 and 2 meters from the perpendicular axis. We found that the UVC HF lamp had virucidal effects (≥96.8% of virus inactivation) against FCoVII, VSV and EMCV after 5 minutes of irradiation at each distance analyzed. Moreover, the UVC+B LED lamp had the highest inhibitory effects on FCoVII and VSV infectivity (≥99% of virus inactivation) when these viruses were settled below the perpendicular axis of the lamp for 5 minutes. Conversely, the UVC+A LED lamp was the least effective, achieving ≥85.9% inactivation of enveloped RNA viruses after 8 hours of UV exposure. Overall, UV light lamps, and in particular UVC HF and UVC+B LED ones, had a rapid and strong virucidal activity against distinct RNA viruses, including coronaviruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viruses , Humans , Ultraviolet Rays , SARS-CoV-2 , Disinfection
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(10)2023 05 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236123

ABSTRACT

We assessed the disinfection efficacy of an ozone generator prototype in ambulances used to transport patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This research consisted of three stages: in vitro tests using microbial indicators, such as Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella phage, which were experimentally inoculated onto polystyrene crystal surfaces within a 23 m3 enclosure. They were then exposed to ozone at a 25 ppm concentration using the ozone generator (Tecnofood SAC) portable prototype, and the decimal reduction time (D) was estimated for each indicator. The second stage involved the experimental inoculation of the same microbial indicators on a variety of surfaces inside conventional ambulances. The third stage consisted of exploratory field testing in ambulances used to transport patients with suspected COVID-19. During the second and third stages, samples were collected by swabbing different surfaces before and after 25 ppm ozonisation for 30 min. Results suggested that ozone was most effective on Candida albicans (D = 2.65 min), followed by Escherichia coli (D = 3.14 min), Salmonella phage (D = 5.01 min) and Staphylococcus aureus (D = 5.40 min). Up to 5% of the microbes survived following ozonisation of conventional ambulances. Of the 126 surface samples collected from ambulances transporting patients with COVID-19, 7 were positive (5.6%) for SARS-related coronavirus as determined on reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Ozone exposure from the ozone generator prototype inside ambulances at a concentration of 25 ppm for 30 min can eliminate gram positive and negative bacteria, yeasts, and viruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ozone , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Ambulances , Peru , Pandemics , Staphylococcus aureus , Escherichia coli
5.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0286740, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20234001

ABSTRACT

Apart from aerosols, contaminated surfaces with SARS-CoV-2 virus are the significant carriers of virus transmission. The disinfection and sanitization of the indoor and outdoor places are one among the powerful and effective strategies to avoid the surface-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) through frequent touch and physical contact. Electrostatic spraying is one of the effective and efficient methods to apply the liquid-based sprays on surfaces to be disinfected or sanitized. This technique covers the directly exposed and obscured surfaces uniformly and reaches to hidden areas of the target. In this paper, the design and performance parameters of a motorized pressure-nozzle based handheld electrostatic disinfection device were optimized and the chargeability of ethanol (C2H5OH), formaldehyde (CH2O), glutaraldehyde (C5H8O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), phenol (C6H5OH) and sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) has been critically investigated. The chargeability indicator for disinfectants was presented in terms of the charge-to-mass ratio. The significant value of the charge-to-mass ratio of 1.82 mC/kg was achieved at an applied voltage of 2.0 kV, the liquid flow rate and pressure of 28 ml/min and 5 MPa, respectively. The experimental results are well aligned to the proposed theoretical context.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfectants , Humans , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Hydrogen Peroxide , Static Electricity , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets
6.
Environ Int ; 177: 108022, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20231002

ABSTRACT

A non-filter virus inactivation unit was developed that can control the irradiation dose of aerosolized viruses by controlling the lighting pattern of a 280 nm deep-UV (DUV)-LED and the air flowrate. In this study, the inactivation properties of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 were quantitatively evaluated by controlling the irradiation dose to the virus inside the inactivation unit. The RNA concentration of SARS-CoV-2 remained constant when the total irradiation dose of DUV irradiation to the virus exceeded 16.5 mJ/cm2. This observation suggests that RNA damage may occur in regions below the detection threshold of RT-qPCR assay. However, when the total irradiation dose was less than 16.5 mJ/cm2, the RNA concentration monotonically increased with a decreasing LED irradiation dose. However, the nucleocapsid protein concentration of SARS-CoV-2 was not predominantly dependent on the LED irradiation dose. The plaque assay showed that 99.16% of the virus was inactivated at 8.1 mJ/cm2 of irradiation, and no virus was detected at 12.2 mJ/cm2 of irradiation, resulting in a 99.89% virus inactivation rate. Thus, an irradiation dose of 23% of the maximal irradiation capacity of the virus inactivation unit can activate more than 99% of SARS-CoV-2. These findings are expected to enhance versatility in various applications. The downsizing achieved in our study renders the technology apt for installation in narrow spaces, while the enhanced flowrates establish its viability for implementation in larger facilities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viruses , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Disinfection/methods , Ultraviolet Rays , RNA
7.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 8229, 2023 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2321748

ABSTRACT

UV irradiation is an efficient tool for the disinfection of viruses in general and coronavirus specifically. This study explores the disinfection kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 variants wild type (similar to the Wuhan strain) and three variants (Alpha, Delta, and Omicron) by 267 nm UV-LED. All variants showed more than 5 logs average reduction in copy number at 5 mJ/cm2 but inconsistency was evident, especially for the Alpha variant. Increasing the dose to 7 mJ/cm2 did not increase average inactivation but did result in a dramatic decrease in the inactivation inconsistency making this dose the recommended minimum. Sequence analysis suggests that the difference between the variants is likely due to small differences in the frequency of specific UV extra-sensitive nucleotide sequence motifs although this hypothesis requires further experimental testing. In summary, the use of UV-LED with their simple electricity need (can be operated from a battery or photovoltaic panel) and geometrical flexibility could offer many advantages in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 spread, but minimal UV dose should be carefully considered.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viruses , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Disinfection , Ultraviolet Rays
8.
Chemosphere ; 333: 138885, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327429

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increasing the usage of iodinated contrast media (ICM), and thus an increase in the prevalence of ICM-contaminated wastewater. While ICM is generally safe, this has the potential to be problematic because as medical wastewater is treated and disinfected, various ICM-derived disinfection byproducts (DBPs) may be generated and released into the environment. However, little information was available about whether ICM-derived DBPs are toxic to aquatic organisms. In this study, the degradation of three typical ICM (iopamidol, iohexol, diatrizoate) at initial concentration of 10 µM and 100 µM in chlorination and peracetic acid without or with NH4+ was investigated, and the potential acute toxicity of treated disinfected water containing potential ICM-derived DBPs on Daphnia magna, Scenedesmus sp. and Danio rerio was tested. The degradation results suggested that only iopamidol was significantly degraded (level of degradation >98%) by chlorination, and the degradation rate of iohexol and diatrizoate were significantly increased in chlorination with NH4+. All three ICM were not degraded in peracetic acid. The toxicity analysis results indicate that only the disinfected water of iopamidol and iohexol by chlorination with NH4+ were toxic to at least one aquatic organism. These results highlighted that the potential ecological risk of ICM-contained medical wastewater by chlorination with NH4+ should not be neglected, and peracetic acid may be an environment-friendly alternative for the disinfection of wastewater containing ICM.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Iodine Compounds , Scenedesmus , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Humans , Iohexol/toxicity , Iohexol/analysis , Iopamidol , Disinfection/methods , Diatrizoate/analysis , Daphnia , Zebrafish , Peracetic Acid , Wastewater/toxicity , Pandemics , Contrast Media/toxicity , Contrast Media/analysis , Water/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Halogenation
9.
Microbiol Res ; 272: 127388, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320562

ABSTRACT

The stability of SARS-CoV-2 for varying periods on a wide range of inanimate surfaces has raised concerns about surface transmission; however, there is still no evidence to confirm this route. In the present review, three variables affecting virus stability, namely temperature, relative humidity (RH), and initial virus titer, were considered from different experimental studies. The stability of SARS-CoV-2 on the surfaces of six different contact materials, namely plastic, metal, glass, protective equipment, paper, and fabric, and the factors affecting half-life period was systematically reviewed. The results showed that the half-life of SARS-CoV-2 on different contact materials was generally 2-10 h, up to 5 d, and as short as 30 min at 22 °C, whereas the half-life of SARS-CoV-2 on non-porous surfaces was generally 5-9 h d, up to 3 d, and as short as 4 min at 22 â„ƒ. The half-life on porous surfaces was generally 1-5 h, up to 2 d, and as short as 13 min at 22 °C. Therefore, the half-life period of SARS-CoV-2 on non-porous surfaces is longer than that on porous surfaces, and thehalf-life of the virus decreases with increasing temperature, whereas RH produces a stable negative inhibitory effect only in a specific humidity range. Various disinfection precautions can be implemented in daily life depending on the stability of SARS-CoV-2 on different surfaces to interrupt virus transmission, prevent COVID-19 infections, and avoid over-disinfection. Owing to the more stringent control of conditions in laboratory studies and the lack of evidence of transmission through surfaces in the real world, it is difficult to provide strong evidence for the efficiency of transmission of the contaminant from the surface to the human body. Therefore, we suggest that future research should focus on exploring the systematic study of the entire transmission process of the virus, which will provide a theoretical basis for optimizing global outbreak prevention and control measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Temperature , Textiles , Disinfection
10.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 13: 1170505, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2318112

ABSTRACT

Background: Low temperature is conducive to the survival of COVID-19. Some studies suggest that cold-chain environment may prolong the survival of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and increase the risk of transmission. However, the effect of cold-chain environmental factors and packaging materials on SARS-CoV-2 stability remains unclear. Methods: This study aimed to reveal cold-chain environmental factors that preserve the stability of SARS-CoV-2 and further explore effective disinfection measures for SARS-CoV-2 in the cold-chain environment. The decay rate of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus in the cold-chain environment, on various types of packaging material surfaces, i.e., polyethylene plastic, stainless steel, Teflon and cardboard, and in frozen seawater was investigated. The influence of visible light (wavelength 450 nm-780 nm) and airflow on the stability of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus at -18°C was subsequently assessed. Results: Experimental data show that SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus decayed more rapidly on porous cardboard surfaces than on nonporous surfaces, including polyethylene (PE) plastic, stainless steel, and Teflon. Compared with that at 25°C, the decay rate of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus was significantly lower at low temperatures. Seawater preserved viral stability both at -18°C and with repeated freeze-thaw cycles compared with that in deionized water. Visible light from light-emitting diode (LED) illumination and airflow at -18°C reduced SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus stability. Conclusion: Our studies indicate that temperature and seawater in the cold chain are risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and LED visible light irradiation and increased airflow may be used as disinfection measures for SARS-CoV-2 in the cold-chain environment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Refrigeration , Disinfection , Stainless Steel , Plastics , Polytetrafluoroethylene , Polyethylenes
11.
Environ Sci Technol ; 57(21): 7913-7923, 2023 05 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315445

ABSTRACT

Antiviral transformation products (TPs) generated during wastewater treatment are an environmental concern, as their discharge, in considerable amounts, into natural waters during a pandemic can pose possible risks to the aquatic environment. Identification of the hazardous TPs generated from antivirals during wastewater treatment is important. Herein, chloroquine phosphate (CQP), which was widely used during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, was selected for research. We investigated the TPs generated from CQP during water chlorination. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos were used to assess the developmental toxicity of CQP after water chlorination, and hazardous TPs were estimated using effect-directed analysis (EDA). Principal component analysis revealed that the developmental toxicity induced by chlorinated samples could be relevant to the formation of some halogenated TPs. Fractionation of the hazardous chlorinated sample, along with the bioassay and chemical analysis, identified halogenated TP387 as the main hazardous TP contributing to the developmental toxicity induced by chlorinated samples. TP387 could also be formed in real wastewater during chlorination in environmentally relevant conditions. This study provides a scientific basis for the further assessment of environmental risks of CQP after water chlorination and describes a method for identifying unknown hazardous TPs generated from pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Animals , Disinfection/methods , Chlorine/analysis , Zebrafish , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Water
12.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol ; 73(4): 270-276, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2310408

ABSTRACT

Even though ozone has shown its potential for air disinfection in hospital environment, its more frequent use has earned attention only with the COVID-19 pandemic due to its proven antimicrobial effect and low cost of production. The aim of this study was to determine its antimicrobial efficiency against the most common bacterial species in a real-life setting, that is, in the air of one postoperative room of the General Hospital Dr Ivo Pedisic (Sisak, Croatia). Air was sampled for aiborne bacteria before and after treatment with the ozone concentration of 15.71 mg/m3 for one hour. The most dominant Gram-positive bacteria of the genera Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, and Bacillus were reduced by 33 %, 58 %, and 61 %, respectively. The genus Micrococcus proved to be the most resistant. Considering our findings, we recommend longer air treatment with higher ozone concentrations in combination with mechanical cleaning and frequent ventilation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ozone , Humans , Disinfection , Pandemics , Air Microbiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Bacteria , Hospitals
13.
Water Res ; 239: 120020, 2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2307866

ABSTRACT

Environment disinfection effectively curbs transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, elevated concentration of free available chlorine (FAC) in disinfectants can be discharged into surface water, generating toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs). The impact of solar photolysis of FAC on natural organic matter (NOM) to form DBPs has not been well studied. In this work, solar photolysis of FAC was found to result in higher formation of DBPs, DBPs formation potential (DBPsFP), total organic chlorine (TOCl) and lower specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254), compared to dark chlorination. In solar photolysis of FAC, formation of total DBPs was promoted by pH=8, but hindered by the addition of HCO3-, radical scavenger or deoxygenation, while addition of NO3-and NH4+both enhanced the formation of nitrogenous DBPs. Differences in the formation of DBPs in solar photolysis of FAC under various conditions were influenced by reactive species. The formation of trichloromethane (TCM) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) in solar photolysis of FAC positively correlated with the steady-state concentrations of ClO• and O3. The steady-state concentrations of •NO and •NH2 positively correlated with the formation of halonitromethanes (HNMs). HAAs and haloacetonitriles (HANs) mainly contributed to calculated cytotoxicity of DBPs. This study demonstrates that solar photolysis of FAC may significantly impact the formation of DBPs in surface water due to extensive use of disinfectants containing FAC during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfectants , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Water Purification , Humans , Disinfection , Chlorine , Photolysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Halogenation , Water , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
14.
J Water Health ; 21(5): 537-546, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2307201

ABSTRACT

Disinfectants, especially air disinfectants, are necessary to prevent the potential spread of pathogens (bacteria and viruses) in the pandemic era and minimize the spread of pathogens. Some of the commercial disinfectant products that are often used generally contain chlorine dioxide (ClO2) gas. This study tested the effectiveness of two different commercial disinfectants, a liquid stick disinfectant and a powder disinfection card, to carry out the disinfection of pathogenic bacteria in the environment. These two disinfectants were used as a medium for releasing chlorine dioxide gas which has a much stronger bactericidal effect. In the form of liquid stick, ClO2 is more effective in the disinfection process rather than in the form of powder. The effectiveness of the liquid disinfectant in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria is influenced by the temperature and the area of the open space covered. Considering that the release from both disinfectants used is very small (0.002 ppmv/h), it takes a small area to ensure that the disinfection process runs effectively.


Subject(s)
Chlorine Compounds , Disinfectants , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Chlorine/pharmacology , Powders , Oxides/pharmacology , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Disinfection , Bacteria
15.
Braz Oral Res ; 36: e006, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2309020

ABSTRACT

The aim of this scoping review was to provide sufficient information about the effectiveness of ozone gas in virus inactivation of surfaces and objects under different environmental conditions. The review was performed according to the list of PRISMA SrC recommendations and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. The review was registered in Open Science Framework (OSF). EMBASE (Ovid), Lilacs, LIVIVO, MEDLINE (PubMed), SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science were primary sources, and "gray literature" was searched in OpenGray and OpenThesis. A study was included if it reported primary data on the effect of ozone gas application for vehicle-borne and airborne virus inactivation. No language or publication date restriction was applied. The search was conduct on July 1, 2020. A total of 16,120 studies were screened, and after exclusion of noneligible studies, fifteen studies fulfilled all selection criteria. Application of ozone gas varied in terms of concentration, ozone exposure period and the devices used to generate ozone gas. Twelve studies showed positive results for inactivation of different virus types, including bacteriophages, SARS-CoV-2 surrogates and other vehicle-borne viruses. Most of the studies were classified as unclear regarding sponsorship status. Although most of the population has not yet been vaccinated against COVID-19, disinfection of environments, surfaces, and objects is an essential prevention strategy to control the spread of this disease. The results of this Scoping Review demonstrate that ozone gas is promising for viral disinfection of surfaces.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ozone , Delivery of Health Care , Disinfection , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Food Environ Virol ; 15(2): 107-115, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2306046

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different environmental disinfection methods on reducing contaminated surfaces (CSs) by the Omicron BA.2.2 variant of SARS-CoV-2 in the fever clinic between March 20 and May 30, 2022, and to analyze the influences and related factors of CSs. This study includes survey data from 389 positive patients (SPPs) and 204 CSs in the fever clinic, including the CS type, disinfection method, length of time spent in the clinic, cycle threshold (CT) value, name, age, weight, mask type, mask-wearing compliance, hand-mouth touch frequency and sex. Associations between study variables and specified outcomes were explored using univariate regression analyses. Mask-wearing compliance had a significant negative correlation with CSs (r = - 0.446, P = 0.037). Among the 389 SPPs, 22 SPPs (CRP, 5.66%) caused CSs in the separate isolation room. A total of 219 SPPs (56.30%) were male. The mean age of SPPs was 4.34 ± 3.92 years old, and the mean CT value was 12.44 ± 5.11. In total, 9952 samples with exposure history were taken, including 204 (2.05%) CSs. Among the CSs, the positive rate of flat surfaces was the highest in public areas (2.52%) and separate isolation rooms (4.75%). Disinfection methods of ultraviolet radiation + chemical irradiation significantly reduced the CSs in both the public area (0% vs. 4.56%) and the separate isolation room (0.76% vs. 2.64%) compared with the chemical method alone (P < 0.05). Compared with ordinary SPPs, CRPs were older (6.04 year vs. 4.23 year), and the male proportion was higher (72.73% vs. 55.31%). In particular, it was found that SPPs contaminated their surroundings and therefore imposed risks on other people. Environmental disinfection with ultraviolet radiation + chemical treatment should be emphasized. The findings may be useful to guide infection control practices for the Omicron BA.2.2 variant of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Female , Disinfection , Fomites , Ultraviolet Rays , China
17.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 13: 1061647, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2290912

ABSTRACT

Background: Reprocessing and disinfecting endoscopes is a routine practice in otolaryngology. An effective, safe, and rapid disinfection technique is essential during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To validate the efficacy of chlorine dioxide wipes in disinfecting three types of airway endoscopes contaminated with COVID-19-positive patient secretions. Methods: Chlorine dioxide wipes were tested on rigid nasal endoscopes, laryngoscope blades, and flexible bronchoscopes. The endoscopes were disinfected using the wipes after exposure to COVID-19-positive patients. The tested scope was included in the study if the post procedure pre disinfection swab was positive for COVID-19 virus using RT-PCR. We analyzed 38 samples for 19 subjects (scopes) pre and post disinfection with chlorine dioxide wipes from July 2021 to February 2022. Results: A total of four rigid endoscopes, four flexible bronchoscopes, and four laryngoscopes were included in the study which represent 24 pre and post disinfection swabs. The others were excluded because of negative pre disinfection swab. All the post disinfection PCR swab results were negative. Conclusion: Chlorine dioxide is a convenient, fast, and effective disinfection technique for COVID-19-contaminated airway endoscopes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods
18.
ACS Appl Bio Mater ; 6(5): 1981-1991, 2023 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296132

ABSTRACT

Numerous disinfection methods have been developed to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases that threaten human health. However, it still remains elusively challenging to develop eco-friendly and cost-effective methods that deactivate a wide range of pathogens, from viruses to bacteria and fungi, without doing any harm to humans or the environment. Herein we report a natural spraying protocol, based on a water-dispersible supramolecular sol of nature-derived tannic acid (TA) and Fe3+, which is easy-to-use and low-cost. Our formulation effectively deactivates viruses (influenza A viruses, SARS-CoV-2, and human rhinovirus) as well as suppressing the growth and spread of pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii) and fungi (Pleurotus ostreatus and Trichophyton rubrum). Its versatile applicability in a real-life setting is also demonstrated against microorganisms present on the surfaces of common household items (e.g., air filter membranes, disposable face masks, kitchen sinks, mobile phones, refrigerators, and toilet seats).


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , COVID-19 , Viruses , Humans , Polyphenols/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Bacteria , Escherichia coli , Fungi
19.
Chemosphere ; 331: 138753, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2295299

ABSTRACT

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic epidemic, the excessive usage of chlorinated disinfectants raised the substantial risks of disinfection by-products (DBPs) exposure. While several technologies may remove the typical carcinogenic DBPs, trichloroacetic acid (TCAA), their application for continuous treatment is limited due to their complexity and expensive or hazardous inputs. In this study, degradation and dechlorination of TCAA induced by an in situ 222 nm KrCl* excimer radiation as well as role of oxygen in the reaction pathway were investigated. Quantum chemical calculation methods were used to help predict the reaction mechanism. Experimental results showed that UV irradiance increased with increasing input power and decreased when the input power exceeded 60 W. Decomposition and dechlorination were simultaneously achieved, where around 78% of TCAA (0.62 mM) can be eliminated and 78% dechlorination within 200 min. Dissolved oxygen showed little effect on the TCAA degradation but greatly boosted the dechlorination as it can additionally generate hydroxyl radical (•OH) in the reaction process. Computational results showed that under 222 nm irradiation, TCAA was excited from S0 to S1 state and then decayed by internal crossing process to T1 state, and a reaction without potential energy barrier followed, resulting in the breaking of C-Cl bond and finally returning to S0 state. Subsequent C-Cl bond cleavage occurred by a barrierless •OH insertion and HCl elimination (27.9 kcal/mol). Finally, the •OH attacked (14.6 kcal/mol) the intermediate byproducts, leading to complete dechlorination and decomposition. The KrCl* excimer radiation has obvious advantages in terms of energy efficiency compared to other competitive methods. These results provide insight into the mechanisms of TCAA dechlorination and decomposition under KrCl* excimer radiation, as well as important information for guiding research toward direct and indirect photolysis of halogenated DBPs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfectants , Humans , Trichloroacetic Acid , Disinfection , Halogenation
20.
Environ Sci Technol ; 57(16): 6589-6598, 2023 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292272

ABSTRACT

Mask wearing and bleach disinfectants became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bleach generates toxic species including hypochlorous acid (HOCl), chlorine (Cl2), and chloramines. Their reaction with organic species can generate additional toxic compounds. To understand interactions between masks and bleach disinfection, bleach was injected into a ventilated chamber containing a manikin with a breathing system and wearing a surgical or KN95 mask. Concentrations inside the chamber and behind the mask were measured by a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS) and a Vocus proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (Vocus PTRMS). HOCl, Cl2, and chloramines were observed during disinfection and concentrations inside the chamber are 2-20 times greater than those behind the mask, driven by losses to the mask surface. After bleach injection, many species decay more slowly behind the mask by a factor of 0.5-0.7 as they desorb or form on the mask. Mass transfer modeling confirms the transition of the mask from a sink during disinfection to a source persisting >4 h after disinfection. Humidifying the mask increases reactive formation of chloramines, likely related to uptake of ammonia and HOCl. These experiments indicate that masks are a source of chemical exposure after cleaning events occur.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disinfectants , Humans , Hypochlorous Acid , Chloramines/chemistry , N95 Respirators , Pandemics , Disinfectants/chemistry , Disinfectants/toxicity , Disinfection , Chlorine/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL